There
are people who support the following article and others who do not.
The only reason we post it for you is for this purpose:
There
is a soul, and it goes away from the body when you die.
Do not choose death as an option to go “no where”. You are a living soul.
While the Bible proves this time and time again, there are those who need
“scientific” proof. This article
has helped many to “understand” the nature of death, dying, and the change
or movement to an eternal location. Needless
to say, a skeptic (One who instinctively or habitually doubts, questions, or
disagrees with assertions or generally accepted conclusions.
One inclined to skepticism in religious matters.) will never believe
anything but what he or she wants to think.
Please read the article with God’s Word in your heart for
understanding. The synthesis, or end
result, of the article is this: “If
it is definitely proved that there is in the human being a loss of substance at
death not accounted for by known channels of loss, and that such loss
of substance does not occur in the dog as my experiments would seem to show,
then we have here a physiological difference between the human and the canine at
least and probably between the human and all other forms of animal life.”
Thus, man has a soul which causes a loss of physical body weight when
it leaves the body upon death. Dogs
and other animals do not have this. (read
Genesis 1 for the details of why.)
Physical
Proof that there is a Soul that lives after Physical Death
American
Medicine ~ April, 1907
Hypothesis
Concerning Soul Substance Together with Experimental Evidence of The Existence
of Such Substance
by Duncan
MacDougall, M.D.
of Haverhill,
Mass.
If personal continuity after the event of bodily death
is a fact, if the psychic functions continue to exist as a separate individually
or personality after the death of brain and body, then such personality can only
exit as a space occupying body, unless the relations between space objective and
space notions in our consciousness, established in our consciousness by heredity
and experience, are entirely wiped out at death and a new set of relations
between space and consciousness suddenly established in the continuing
personality. This would be an unimaginable breach in the continuity of nature.
It is unthinkable that personality and consciousness continuing personal
identity should exist, and have being, and yet not occupy space. It is
impossible to represent in thought that which is not space-occupying, as having
personality; for that would be equivalent to thinking that nothing had become or
was something, that emptiness had personality, that space itself was more than
space, all of which are contradictions and absurd.
Since therefore it is necessary to the continuance of conscious life and
personal identity after death, that they must have for a basis that which is
space-occupying, or substance, the question arises has this substance weight, is
it ponderable?
The
essential thing is that there must be a substance as the basis of
continuing personal identity and consciousness, for without space-occupying
substance, personality or a continuing conscious ego after bodily death is
unthinkable.
According to the latest conception of science, substance, or
space-occupying material, is divisible into that which is gravitative, solids,
liquids, gases, all having weight, and the ether which is nongravitative. It
seemed impossible to me that the soul substance could consist of the ether. If
the conception is true that ether is continuous and not to be conceived of as
existing or capable of existing in separate masses, we have here the most solid
ground for believing that the soul substance we are seeking is not ether,
because one of the very first attributes of personal identity is the quality of
separateness. Nothing is more borne in upon consciousness, than that the ego is
detached and separate from all things else - the nonego.
We are therefore driven back upon the assumption that the soul substance so necessary to the conception of continuing personal
identity, after the death of this material body, must still be a form
of gravitative matter, or perhaps a middle form of substance neither gravitative
matter or ether, not capable of being weighed, and yet not identical with ether.
Since however the substance considered in our hypothesis is linked organically
with the body until death takes place, it appears to me more reasonable to think
that it must be some form of gravitative matter, and therefore capable of being detected at death by weighing a
human being in the act of death.
My
first subject was a man dying of tuberculosis. It seemed to me
best to select a patient dying with a disease that produces great exhaustion,
the death occurring with little or no muscular movement, because in such a case
the beam could be kept more perfectly at balance and any loss occurring readily
noted.
The patient was under observation for three hours and forty minutes before
death, lying on a bed arranged on a light framework built upon very delicately
balanced platform beam scales.
The patient's comfort was looked after in every way, although he was
practically moribund when placed upon the bed. He lost weight slowly at the rate
of one ounce per hour due to evaporation of moisture in respiration and
evaporation of sweat.
During
all three hours and forty minutes I kept the beam end slightly above balance
near the upper limiting bar in order to make the test more decisive if it should
come.
At the end of three hours and forty minutes he expired and suddenly
coincident with death the beam end dropped with an audible stroke hitting
against the lower limiting bar and remaining there with no rebound. The loss was
ascertained to be three-fourths of an ounce. This loss of weight could not be
due to evaporation of respiratory moisture and sweat, because that had already
been determined to go on, in his case, at the rate of one sixtieth of an ounce
per minute, whereas this loss was sudden and large, three-fourths of an ounce in
a few seconds.
The bowels did not move; if they had moved the weight would still have
remained upon the bed except for a slow loss by the evaporation of moisture
depending, of course, upon the fluidity of the feces. The bladder evacuated one
or two drams of urine. This remained upon the bed and could only have influenced
the weight by slow gradual evaporation and therefore in no way could account for the sudden loss.
There remained but one more channel of loss to explore, the expiration of
all but the residual air in the lungs. Getting upon the bed myself, my colleague
put the beam at actual balance. Inspiration and expiration of air as forcibly as
possible by me had no effect upon the beam. My colleague got upon the bed and I
placed the beam at balance. Forcible inspiration and expiration of air on his part had no effect.
In
this case we certainly have an inexplicable loss of weight of three-fourths of
an ounce. Is it the soul substance? How other shall we explain it?
My
second patient was a man moribund from tuberculosis. He was on
the bed about four hours and fifteen minutes under observation before death. The
first four hours he lost weight at the rate of three-fourths of an ounce per
hour. He had much slower respiration than the first case, which accounted for
the difference in loss of weight from evaporation of perspiration and
respiratory moisture.
The last fifteen minutes he had ceased to breathe but his facial muscles still
moved convulsively, and then, coinciding with the last movement of the facial
muscles, the beam dropped. The weight
lost was found to be half an ounce. Then my colleague auscultated
(The act of listening for sounds made by internal organs, as the heart and
lungs, to aid in the diagnosis of certain disorders.) the heart and found it
stopped. I tried again and the loss was one ounce and a half and fifty grains.
In the eighteen minutes that lapsed between the time he ceased breathing until
we were certain of death, there was a weight loss of one and a half ounces and
fifty grains compared with a loss of three ounces during a period of four hours,
during which time the ordinary channels of loss were at work. No bowel movement
took place. The bladder moved but the urine remained upon the bed and could not
have evaporated enough through the thick bed clothing to have influenced the
result. The beam at the end of eighteen minutes of doubt was placed again
with the end in slight contact with the upper bar and watched for forty minutes
but no
further loss took place.
My scales were sensitive to two-tenths of an ounce. If placed at balance
one-tenth of an ounce would lift the beam up close to the upper limiting bar,
another one-tenth ounce would bring it up and keep it in direct contact, then if
the two-tenths were removed the beam would drop to the lower bar and then slowly
oscillate till balance was reached again. This patient was of a totally
different temperament from the first, his death was very gradual, so that we had
great doubts from the ordinary evidence to say just what moment he died.
My
third case, a man dying of tuberculosis, showed a
weight of half and ounce lost, coincident with death, and an
additional loss of one ounce a few minutes later.
In
the fourth case, a woman dying of diabetic coma, unfortunately
our scales were not finely adjusted and there was a good deal of interference by
people opposed to our work, and although at death the beam sunk so that it required from
three-eighths to one-half ounce to bring it back to the point preceding death,
yet I regard this test as of no value.
My
fifth case, a man dying of tuberculosis, showed
a distinct drop in the beam requiring about three-eighths of an ounce which
could not be accounted for. This occurred exactly simultaneously with death but
peculiarly on bringing the beam up again with weights and later removing them,
the beam did not sink back to stay for fully fifteen minutes. It was impossible
to account for the three-eighths of an ounce drop, it was so sudden and
distinct, the beam hitting the lower bar with as great a noise as in the first
case. Our scales in the case were very sensitively balanced.
My
sixth and last case was not a fair test. The patient died almost
within five minutes after being placed upon the bed and died while I was
adjusting the beam.
In my communication to Dr. Hodgson I note that I have said there was no
loss of weight. It should have been added that there was no loss of weight that
we were justified in recording.
My notes taken at the time of experiment show a loss of one and one-half
ounces but in addition it should have been said the experiment was so hurried,
jarring of the scales had not wholly ceased and the apparent weight loss, one
and one-half ounces, might have been due to accidental shifting of the sliding
weight on that beam. This could not have been true of the other tests; no one of
them was done hurriedly.
My sixth case I regard as one of no value from this cause. The same
experiments were carried out on fifteen dogs, surrounded by every precaution to
obtain accuracy and the results were uniformly negative, no loss of weight at
death.
A loss of weight takes places about 20 to 30 minutes after death which is
due to the evaporation of the urine normally passed, and which is duplicated by
evaporation of the same amount of water on the scales, every other condition
being the same, e.g., temperature of the room, except the presence of the dog's
body.
The dogs experimented on weighed between 15 and 70 pounds and the scales
with the total weight upon them were sensitive to one-sixteenth of an ounce. The
tests on dogs were vitiated by the use of two drugs administered to secure the
necessary quiet and freedom from struggle so necessary to keep the beam at
balance. (such
loss of substance does not occur in the dog)
The ideal tests on dogs
would be obtained in those dying from some disease that rendered them much
exhausted and incapable of struggle. It was not my fortune to get dogs dying
from such sickness.
The
net result of the experiments conducted on human beings, is that a loss of
substance occurs at death not accounted for by known channels of loss. Is it the
soul substance? It would seem to me to be so. According to our
hypothesis such a substance is necessary to the assumption of continuing or
persisting personality after bodily death, and here we have experimental
demonstration that a substance capable of being weighed does leave the human
body at death.
If this substance is a counterpart to the physical body, has the same
bulk, occupies the same dimensions in space, then it is a very much lighter
substance than the atmosphere surrounding our earth which weighs about one and
one-fourth ounces per cubic foot. This would be a fact of great significance, as
such a body would readily ascend in our atmosphere. The absence of a weighable
mass leaving the body at death would of course be no argument against continuing
personality, for a space-occupying body or substance might exist not capable of
being weighed, such as the ether.
It has been suggested that the ether might be that substance, but with the
modern conception of science that the ether is the primary form of all
substance, that all other forms of matter are merely differentiations of the
ether having varying densities, then it seems to me that soul substance which is
in this life linked organically with the body, cannot be identical with the
ether. Moreover, the ether is supposed to be nondiscontinuous, a continuous
whole and not capable of existing in separate masses as ether, whereas the one
prime requisite for a continuing personality or individuality is the quality of
separateness, the ego as separate and distinct from all things else, the nonego.
To my mind therefore the soul substance cannot be the ether as ether; but
if the theory that ether is the primary form of all substance is true, then the
soul substance must necessarily be a differentiated form of it.
If
it is definitely proved that there is in the human being a loss of substance at
death not accounted for by known channels of loss, and that such loss of
substance does not occur in the dog as my experiments would seem to show,
then we have here a physiological difference between the human and the canine at
least and probably between the human and all other forms of animal life.
I am aware that a large number of experiments would require to be made
before the matter can be proved beyond any possibility of error, but if further
and sufficient experimentation proves that there is a loss of substance
occurring at death and not accounted for by known channels of loss, the
establishment of such a truth cannot fail to be of the utmost importance.
One ounce of fact more or less will have more weight in demonstrating the
truth of the reality of continued existences with the necessary basis of
substance to rest upon, than all the hair-splitting theories of theologians and
metaphysicians combined.
If other experiments prove that there is a loss of weight occurring at
death, not accounted for by known channels of loss, we must either admit the
theory that it is the hypothetical soul substance, or some other explanation of
the phenomenon should be forthcoming. If proved true, the materialistic
conception will have been fully met, and proof of the substantial basis for mind
or spirit or soul continuing after the death of the body, insisted upon as
necessary by the materialists, will have been furnished.
It will prove also that the spiritualistic conception of the immateriality
of the soul was wrong. The postulates of religious creeds have not been a
positive and final settlement of the question.
The theories of all the philosophers and all the philosophies offer no
final solution of the problem of continued personality after bodily death. This
fact alone of a space occupying body of measurable weight disappearing at death,
if verified, furnishes the substantial basis for persisting personality or a
conscious ego surviving the act of bodily death, and in the element of certainty
is worth more than the postulates of all the creeds and all the metaphysical
arguments combined.
In the year 1854 Rudolph Wagner, the physiologist, at the Gottingen
Congress of Physiologists, proposed a discussion of a "Special Soul
Substance." The challenge was accepted, but no discussion followed and
among the 500 voices present not one was raised in defense of a spiritualistic
philosophy. Have we found Wagner's soul substance?
But
where does the soul go after death? It
is up to you where you go. You have
free will, but within the Creator’s options.
Choice One or Two?
This website does necessarily agree or
disagree with the information listed above. We do know that God has each person
having an eternal soul.
